Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2285190

ABSTRACT

Introduction: SARS-COV-2 is mainly transmitted through respiratory droplets. The standard diagnostic procedure is based on a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Aim(s): 1) To develop a safe and easy to perform breath test for the detection of COVID-19 in hospitalised patients based on the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. 2) To differentiate in hospitalised patients with respiratory symptoms those with and without COVID-19. Method(s): We performed a monocenter, cross-sectional, case-control study in 38 subjects (63% males, age 62+/-12.7 yrs) admitted at the pulmonology ward. Breath samples were taken using a home-made sampling system. Analysis of breath samples was performed by proton transfer high resolution mass spectrometry (PTR-HRMS). A lassoregression with leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to differentiate the groups and designate the most differentiating VOCs. Result(s): COVID-19 positive (n=22) and control respiratory patients (n=16) were similar with respect to baseline characteristics, except for lower blood neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and higher ferritin level in COVID+ve patients (p<0.05). Lasso-regression revealed 6 VOCs as potential biomarkers that differentiated between both groups with 84% accuracy, 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value based on PTR-HRMS data. Conclusion(s): Breath analysis could identify a breathprint differentiating between hospitalised COVID-19 and nonCOVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms with a good accuracy. Therefore, VOCs profiling could be integrated in sensors allowing a fast breathalyzer for COVID-19 for large-scale screening.

6.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 46: 39-48, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1157293

ABSTRACT

The ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than 100 million people and clinics are being established for diagnosing and treating lingering symptoms, so called long-COVID. A key concern are neurological and long-term cognitive complications. At the same time, the prevalence and nature of the cognitive sequalae of COVID-19 are unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the frequency, pattern and severity of cognitive impairments 3-4 months after COVID-19 hospital discharge, their relation to subjective cognitive complaints, quality of life and illness variables. We recruited patients at their follow-up visit at the respiratory outpatient clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, approximately four months after hospitalisation with COVID-19. Patients underwent pulmonary, functional and cognitive assessments. Twenty-nine patients were included. The percentage of patients with clinically significant cognitive impairment ranged from 59% to 65% depending on the applied cut-off for clinical relevance of cognitive impairment, with verbal learning and executive functions being most affected. Objective cognitive impairment scaled with subjective cognitive complaints, lower work function and poorer quality of life. Cognitive impairments were associated with d-dimer levels during acute illness and residual pulmonary dysfunction. In conclusion, these findings provide new evidence for frequent cognitive sequelae of COVID-19 and indicate an association with the severity of the lung affection and potentially restricted cerebral oxygen delivery. Further, the associations with quality of life and functioning call for systematic cognitive screening of patients after recovery from severe COVID-19 illness and implementation of targeted treatments for patients with persistent cognitive impairments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Patient Discharge/trends , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL